When a U.S. President Tried to Change Thanksgiving

In 1939, President Franklin D. Roosevelt made a decision that would spark a national debate and reveal profound insights into human psychology and the importance of rituals in our lives. Faced with the economic challenges of the time, Roosevelt proposed to change the date of Thanksgiving, moving it from its traditional date in late November to an earlier date in the month. This change, he hoped, would extend the holiday shopping season and boost economic activity. However, the proposal was met with widespread resistance and uproar, demonstrating the deep-seated psychological reactions that occur when long-standing rituals are threatened with change.

The reaction to Roosevelt's proposal was not just about the practical implications of moving a holiday. It was a reflection of the moral and emotional significance that rituals hold for individuals and communities. Thanksgiving, like many other cultural and religious rituals, is deeply embedded in the collective identity of Americans. It represents not just a day of feasting and giving thanks, but a symbol of continuity, shared values, and communal history. Altering such a ritual is perceived not just as a change in schedule, but as an affront to these deeply held group values.

Psychologists have long studied the role of rituals in human life, finding that they serve multiple functions. They provide a sense of order and predictability in an otherwise chaotic world, offering comfort and security. They also facilitate social cohesion by providing shared experiences and a common language through which group members can express their identity and solidarity. When a ritual is altered or threatened, it can provoke a sense of moral indignation because it is seen as a challenge to these fundamental aspects of group life.

The outcry over Roosevelt's proposed change to Thanksgiving is a classic example of this phenomenon. Researchers have noted similar reactions in other contexts where traditional rituals or practices have been challenged. Whether it's a religious group resisting changes to their worship practices or a community fighting to preserve a local tradition, the response often involves a strong emotional component, including feelings of betrayal, loss, and anger. These reactions are not just about the specific ritual being altered; they reflect a broader concern about the preservation of group identity and the continuity of cultural heritage.

Understanding the psychological impact of ritual change is crucial not only for historians and psychologists but also for policymakers and leaders who may need to navigate such changes. It suggests that any attempt to alter long-standing rituals or traditions must be approached with sensitivity and a deep understanding of their symbolic and emotional significance. It also highlights the importance of dialogue and engagement with affected communities, as these can help to mitigate the potential for moral outrage and facilitate a more gradual and accepted transition.

In the end, Roosevelt's attempt to change Thanksgiving serves as a powerful lesson in the psychology of human behavior and the profound significance of rituals in our lives. It reminds us that while change is inevitable, the way we approach it can either strengthen or undermine the bonds that hold communities together.